aocpy

Solutions and utility script for Advent of Code challenges in Python.

AoC 2015

• Day 1: 3:10
• Day 2: 5:24 :/
• Day 3: 7:26 ... :/
• Day 4: 5:11 ...
• Day 5: 14:05 o.O
• Day 6: 15:00
• Day 7: 17:00
• Day 8: 14:55
• Day 9: 13:48
• Day 10: 70:00 ... slow, but fun
• Day 11: 12:30
• Day 12: 6:03
• Day 13: 7:06 (would have been first by a minute, probably 70ish in 2023)
• Day 14: 27:45 ... that was weak, logic error for part 2 :/
• Day 15: 16:00 I should probably stop brute forcing these optimization problems
• Day 16: 19:00
• Day 17: 9:05
• Day 18: 10:39
• Day 19: Many days... yeah this one took me way too long to figure out
• Day 20: 10:54
• Day 21: 25:52 cute bug where I didn't consider that no armor is an option
• Day 22: That was bad. Did not know how to choose between dfs/bfs and logic errors.
• Day 23: 10:00
• Day 24: 20:00 ugly - recursive solution would be more elegant
• Day 25: 9:34

AoC 2016

• Day 1: 29:00 That was emberassingly slow. Out of my rhythm?
• Day 2: 13:24 Getting back into it but still slow af, obviously.
• Day 3: 11:20 Ugly and slow.
• Day 4: 21:05 -__-
• Day 5: 29:35 -___-
• Day 6: 4:20 okay
• Day 7: 31:20 hmm
• Day 8: 14:50 meh
• Day 9: 26:00 okay
• Day 10: 23:07 okay
• Day 11: 75:00 -__-
• Day 12: 10:05 okay
• Day 13: 9:43 okayish
• Day 14: 120:00 struggled with this one (example incorrect?)
• Day 15: Trial and error. Should use CRT instead.
• Day 16: 14:11
• Day 17: 45:00 didn't follow instructions... focus!
• Day 18: 9:43
• Day 19: 90:00 that wasn't easy for me
• Day 20: 67:00
• Day 21: 32:33
• Day 22: 90:00
• Day 23: 60:00
• Day 24: 48:00
• Day 25: 6:45

AoC 2017

• Day 1: 7:30
• Day 2: 6:15
• Day 3: 75:00 hmm should have been way quicker
• Day 4: 3:02
• Day 5: 6:13
• Day 6: 8:37
• Day 7: 19:22
• Day 8: 8:15
• Day 9: 6:10
• Day 10: 55:00
• Day 11: 66:06
• Day 12: 6:44
• Day 13: 120:00
• Day 14: 17:48
• Day 15: 11:40
• Day 16: 13:16
• Day 17: 55:00
• Day 18: 23:00
• Day 19: 45:00
• Day 20: 9:55 (would have been 10th)
• Day 21: 90:00
• Day 22: 25:00
• Day 23: Multiple days... but super fun.
• Day 24: 15:45 (48th)
• Day 25: 41:00

AoC 2018

• Day 1: 1:49 (2nd)
• Day 2: 10:53
• Day 3: 6:16 (24th)
• Day 4: 25:16
• Day 5: 17:03
• Day 6: 1:10:29
• Day 7: 20:15
• Day 8: 18:35
• Day 9: 1:17:52
• Day 10: 19:14
• Day 11: 22:52
• Day 12: 180:00
• Day 13: 73:09
• Day 14: 20:48
• Day 15: 185:11
• Day 16: 36:10
• Day 17: 180:00
• Day 18: 24:04
• Day 19: days, super fun, but hard for me
• Day 20:
• Day 21: 28:40 (16th - brute force but still not so bad)
• Day 22: 185:00 (should not have been so slow but was fun)
• Day 23:

AoC 2019

• Day 1: 4:25 (copy and paste error, no leaderboard)
• Day 2: 7:07 (19th)
• Day 3: 10:46 (37th)
• Day 4: 8:48 (just too slow, no leaderboard)
• Day 5: 34:24 (that wasn't hard at all)
• Day 6: 23:17 (so slow, no leaderboard)
• Day 7: 72:17 (I found that one challenging, 30:33 would have been required for leaderboard)
• Day 8: 08:55 (54th)
• Day 9: 115:00 (Try to read next time.)
• Day 10: 76:00 (This wasn't easy for me. Fun, though.)
• Day 11: 21:04 (Too slow, but fun.)
• Day 12: days (Took me a while to get the right idea.)
• Day 13: >120:00 (Just struggling so much for some reason.)
• Day 14: >120:00 (Hmm, wasn't that hard either.)
• Day 15: >120:00 (I am really weak at the moment.)
• Day 16: days (Wow. Just too hard for me to solve quickly?)
• Day 17: days (Fun but too tricky for me to be fast.)
• Day 18: days (Slow and slow algorithm.)
• Day 19: 40:00 (Way too slow! Oversight error. Come on.)
• Day 20: days (Not actually that hard but I struggled for no reason.)
• Day 21: days (But it was super fun!)
• Day 22:

AoC 2020

• Day 1: 2:48 (people weren't able to submit because of a website outage)
• Day 2: 4:47 (no leaderboard, you can tell it's getting faster)
• Day 3: 7:06 (way too slow, lol; time to take it seriously)
• Day 4: 14:30 (yo, I am just too slow)
• Day 5: 11:53 (not competitive)
• Day 6: 4:11 (75th, finally on the leaderboard)
• Day 7: 24:39 (bad)
• Day 8: 6:26 (43th, tied George Hotz :)
• Day 9: 7:37 (choked bad)
• Day 10: 34:27 (so weak)
• Day 11: 21:05 (hmmm, I rally have to analyze why I am so slow)
• Day 12: 21:52 (just slow again for an easy problem)
• Day 13: 18:00 (I don't really understand the CRT to be honest)
• Day 14: 40:26 (Made a bunch of mistakes even misunderstanding Python)
• Day 15: 17:57 (Too slow for an easy one like this)
• Day 16: 33:00 (Not too unhappy really.)
• Day 17: 10:00 (40th)
• Day 18: 80:00 (I am struggling with stuff where parsing is involved)
• Day 19: 78:00 (Should have been faster)
• Day 20: 95:00 (Lot's of code)
• Day 21: 23:02 (Simply to slow)
• Day 22: 45:49 (Simple and too slow)
• Day 23:
• Day 24:

AoC 2022

Done with this. Overall everything is solvable. It's more about consistency and focus. Of course, learning more algorithms and techniques helps.

Times:

• Day 1: 7:52 ... so slow brah :/ top 100 required 2:05...
• Day 2: 22:30 ... I mistyped the first and second was just bad top 100 would have been 6:16 (doable?)
• Day 3: 13:08 actually decent but top 100 required 5:24
• Day 4: 7:08 but top 100 required 3:33 still okay
• Day 5: 11:56 but 7:58 for top 100... getting better?
• Day 6: 3:50 but 2:25 for leaderboard :D
• Day 7: 27:55 and 14:47 for leaderboard; okay, I would say
• Day 8: 61:00 and 10:00 for leaderboard; I need template code for searching coordinate systems
• Day 9: 58:00 and 7:32 for leaderboard; I need code for 2D stuff
• Day 10: 25:20 and 12:17 for leaderboard; okay, okay
• Day 11: 45:00 and 18:00 for leaderboard; arg, it was doable man
• Day 12: 39:45 and 9:46 for leaderboard; the people are ready for their searches :D
• Day 13: 44:00 and 12:56 for leaderboard; these people are just good, seriously
• Day 14: 35:00 and 14:54; I just have to get that much quicker... 2D code!
• Day 15: 150:00 and 27:00; I didn't use Manhattan dist initially, lot's of debugging
• Day 16: 52:00 and 64:00; ARE YOU SAYING I WOULD HAVE MADE THE LEADERBOARD?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
• Day 17: Second one was fun with having to detect the repetition.
• Day 18: 12:00 and 32:00; really straightforward and of course way too slow.
• Day 19: Slow. (2024-09-13 improved with help from hyper neutrino.)
• Day 20: Struggled way too much.
• Day 21: Straightforward and relatively fast.
• Day 22: Very hard and wasn't able to do hands free. Even the best guys took over an hour.
• Day 23: Super straightforward, but took me way longer than it should have because I loose focus and make silly errors. Like back in Middleschool.
• Day 24: Easy. Should have been faster, but no crazy mistakes. Still way too slow for something easy like this.
• Day 25: Quickly solved via constraint solver. Actual solution much simpler. Don't know if I would have been able to figure it out.

AoC 2023

• Day 1: 40:00 (I don't know what I am doing.)
• Day 2: 14:15 (Okay, but far way from leaderboard.)
• Day 3: 1st 20:00, 2nd 70:00... (I had a logic error that took me a while to find.)
• Day 4: 1st 9:06, 2nd 22:31; it wasn't hard but I didn't think quick enough :/
• Day 5: 1st 25:00, 2nd 1:55:00; Required patience and accuracy
• Day 6: 13:54; I was slow because I thought it is much harder?
• Day 7: 75:00; leaderboard 16:00... that was just bad; no excuse
• Day 8: 25:00; I was doing pretty decent here.
• Day 9: 57:00; my input parse function did not consider negative values...
• Day 10: 180:00; this one was hard for me.
• Day 11: 68:00; okay but not elegant and way too slow ofc; x-ray solution would have been neat
• Day 12: 52:00 and 22:00 for leaderboard; had the right idea and I am good at this type of problem
• Day 13: 90:00; pretty straightforward but way too slow
• Day 14: 5:55 for first and then 48:00; straightforward but slow, ofc
• Day 15: 4:30 and 31:20; more reading comprehension than programming
• Day 16: 00:27:30 745; best placement so far, of course still horribly slow
• Day 17: a couple of hours; I realized that I need A* after a while; reused implementation from Project Euler but improved with heapq which was super fun
• Day 18: a couple of hours; I realized that I need shoelace algo for part two but didn't realize that I have to compute the outer edges for a while and after I did, I still got clockwise/counter-clockwise issues. They could have made it meaner by using different clock directions for example and input.
• Day 19: This one was pretty straightforward and required the interval technique we applied earlier.
• Day 20: Part 2 was tough. I had the right idea of printing out the periods of the input conjunction gate pretty early, but then messed up the implementation and thought it wasn't gonna work. Spent a half day thinking up something else before returning to the idea and it worked flawlessly.
• Day 21: Part 1 was straightforward, but part 2 maybe the hardest problem this year.
• Day 22: Not too hard, but definitely way too slow for leaderboard.
• Day 23: I found this fun because it required some creativity for part 2. Slow af, of course.
• Day 24: Solve problem with sympy. I first used numpy to solve part 1 and it was much faster than using sympy, but I lost that solution when switching to sympy. Takes about three minutes to run for part 1 and then part 2 is under a second.
• Day 25: I cheeky solved this by plotting the graph and manually removing the nodes. I should probably try to write an algorith that does that, but meh. Manually plotting requires matplotlib and networkx packages.