Solve 2016 day 18.
This commit is contained in:
32
2016/d18.py
Normal file
32
2016/d18.py
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
|
||||
from lib import *
|
||||
|
||||
row = open(0).read().strip()
|
||||
|
||||
def is_trap(s):
|
||||
assert len(s) == 3
|
||||
match s:
|
||||
case "^^.":
|
||||
return "^"
|
||||
case ".^^":
|
||||
return "^"
|
||||
case "^..":
|
||||
return "^"
|
||||
case "..^":
|
||||
return "^"
|
||||
case _:
|
||||
return "."
|
||||
|
||||
# 400_000 is still easily bruteforcible. If it was a much larget number, we
|
||||
# would have to cache the rows till we get a repeated row. We would then
|
||||
# memorize the number of safe tiles from repeated row to repeated row and jump
|
||||
# forward by multiples of that amount to reach much higher numbers.
|
||||
r = 0
|
||||
for _ in range(400_000):
|
||||
r += row.count(".")
|
||||
nrow = is_trap("." + row[:2])
|
||||
for i in range(1, len(row) - 1):
|
||||
nrow += is_trap(row[i-1:i+2])
|
||||
nrow += is_trap(row[-2:] + ".")
|
||||
row = nrow
|
||||
|
||||
print(r)
|
||||
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ written in Python.
|
||||
- Day 22: That was bad. Did not know how to choose between dfs/bfs and logic errors.
|
||||
- Day 23: 10:00
|
||||
- Day 24: 20:00 ugly - recursive solution would be more elegant
|
||||
- Day 25:
|
||||
- Day 25: 9:34
|
||||
|
||||
# 2016
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -50,7 +50,9 @@ written in Python.
|
||||
- Day 15: Trial and error. Should use CRT instead.
|
||||
- Day 16: 14:11
|
||||
- Day 17: 45:00 didn't follow instructions... focus!
|
||||
- Day 18:
|
||||
- Day 18: 9:43
|
||||
- Day 19:
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# 2017
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user